Welcome to

It is somewhat perverse and probably constitutionally illegal [and therefore also a matter for an exemplary punitive damages claim against the Labour Party] for any consideration of their electing another leader to run as head of government, without going to the country for a popular mandate.

Quite why Mr Brown was afforded such a perversion and quite why it would be considered a prudent move again does rather suggest an unseemly  desperation to hold on to the reins because of what would be revealed to any new government whenever they start to delve into the Government Machine.

Although probably maybe definitely that was exactly why Prudence and Co. perverted the course of democratic politics in favour of Stalinist Beanism.

And that does have one wondering at the supposed wisdom of all those institutions which one would normally have expected to ensure fair and just play in such Great Games. Dumbing it down so, permits all manner of impropriety to crash the system and systems with its systems.

And if that be the case, the system is not Fit for Future Purpose and needs to be replaced, lock, stock and barrel, because until such times as it is, will it continue to be easily manipulated/used/abused.

And how very odd that the Opposition would accept it so, rather than putting the charlatans out of Office and onto the streets and into the Care of the Community they have created/presided over the past decade?

Quite what useful skills they would be able to provide, and be paid for in that sector, is probably also their greatest concern/fear too.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/07/30/do3001.xml

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Posted by: amanfromMars …

I disagree with that idiotic comment by harvardjanitor …..

“WHAT THE HELL. this is stupid; anybody should be able to say anything they want on the internet…free speech is where the internet reigns supreme. taking that away is like…raping the internet. whenever you sign on the net, you know where to stay away if you don’t want to see certain things, and just because there are trolls doesn’t mean you should cry about it. people on forums should ESPECIALLY know this.

hell i do what i want: Women named Jill and Hillary should be raped. Women named Jill and Hillary should be raped. Women named Jill and Hillary should be raped.

i don’t even believe in it. i say it cus i can.”

….. and would simply suggest that one always puts oneself in the opposite position/in the other person’s shoes, in order to get an idea and a feeling of the sense of what one is saying and proposing. And surely
even an idiot can do that.

Just because one can, does not necessarily mean that one should.

http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2008/07/autoadmit

Over to you, Rupert. Can you make a Silk Purse from a Sow’s Ear?*
By amanfromMars
Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 11:50 GMT

They are just “getting on with the job”, don’t you know ……. although with them presently on their hols, it appears that their jobs are sinecure quangos, and of no vital importance at all.

So ……. is Media Governing on its Own with IT Support ……… which is actually a much better Virtual Governance.

Tune that Facility with AI Beta ProgramMIng Schedule and we could turn the Palace of Westminster into a Ghetto of Apartments/Historic Relic and dispense with the outrageous expense of carrying the wasters who are presently squatting there, dragging the City and the nation down into their gutters.

* Of course you can’t. Thanks for the Sow’s ears, but is that all that you have to Offer?

http://theregister.co.uk/2008/07/30/home_office_shrugs_off_surveillance/comments

Old Duffers just don’t know what the Internet hides and what IT can do?
By amanfromMars
Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 12:38 GMT

Presumably any trial would allow for the Defence to reveal everything that Gary did, or is it going to be one of those “secret” trials held in camera, so that no one knows what injustices are done?

After all, it is not as if he was discovering anything secret, is it? After all, $96,000 of virtual damage is practically nothing.

Them Yanks is ‘avin’ a larf and five Law Lords have been made to look like Fools for their amusement. Shame on you,

I wonder if they received anything embarrassing in the post?

http://theregister.co.uk/2008/07/30/mckinnon_lords_appeal/comments

Secrets …what Secrets
By amanfromMars
Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 15:57 GMT

Hmmmm. This is an interesting sentence from Mr Campbell in http://socialistregister.com/socialistregister.com/files/SR_1979_Campbell.pdf given the current, still declining, capitalist crisis/crunch.

“After the Irish experience-interpreted as classic colonial counter-insurgency brought back home–more attention was paid to military and other defensive preparations being made within Britain for a ’strong state-required to enforce a reduction of democracy in a time of capitalist crisis.”

With forces and resources stretched abroad, the UK is wide open to a sneak attack from an Intellectual Challenged Bullying Ally into Friendly Fires and Immunity and Impunity.

And here is a spooky trailer, which was prepared earlier? … http://worldcriminal.com/lta/?p=261

But it’s only a film of imagination and nothing to worry about.

“Only the guilty need fear.” …. By Joe Bloggs Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 12:46 GMT

Joe, what are we to make of those who push the War on Terror threat, for it creates fear and a War of Terror? Is the cure, in reality, the self-serving, ultimately self destroying disease.

From the above quoted pdf, we can read …. “Two students who had worked during a period of national service in British naval Sigint revealed in a magazine how many of the frequent cross-border disputes and incidents during the Cold War were the result of Western provocation deliberately engineered. Prosecuted under Section 2, both received short prison sentences.” …. and it is well known where a lot of fund raising money came from for the Chaos of the “Troubles” in Ireland.

Nice prose, Luther, … Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 13:49 GMT … and in it I suppose lies one possible and most simple answer for anyone who is Sensitised to Information …… Pay them with as much money as they can spend. After all, it just goes straight back to where it came AND it generates a corresponding value in new industry to replace that which has been purchased from stock …. which is just “(like a simple free-energy generator for example)” … By Sillyfellow Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 13:17 GMT … which is not at all Silly but very Astute.

And IT may also be NEUKlearer HyperRadioProActivity too, which would be Priceless in the Right Hands/Frame of Mind?

There’s nowhere to hide anything in Space …. get used to IT showing you what IT has in Store for you.

http://theregister.co.uk/2008/07/30/home_office_shrugs_off_surveillance/comments

Busted metaphor
By amanfromMars
Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 16:48 GMT

“House-breaking metaphor. It’s like someone conducted an illegal search of your house. It doesn’t matter whether he stole anything really, the fact that he got a good look at your pr0n and can tell anyone who asks what you like to watch when no-one is looking should make you want to bust him right in the nose.” …. By Stevie Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 15:26 GMT

Stevie,

Can we then reasonably expect Phorm to be prosecuted ….. following your logic?

http://theregister.co.uk/2008/07/30/mckinnon_lords_appeal/comments

Too good to be true is a valuable Stealth
By amanfromMars
Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 16:56 GMT

“These vague future systems, promising much are nonsense. This is FUD and vaporware.” … By Duncan Hare Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 14:22 GMT

Oh no it’s not. It is very real and Microsoft are playing Catch-Up again. It is their IT Forte and reason for being.

http://theregister.co.uk/2008/07/30/microsoft_midori_technical_details/comments

More than just Jobs for the Boys
By amanfromMars
Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 17:59 GMT

“They own his brain … Or at least, I’d be amazed if they didn’t … My employer certainly owns mine, and the copyright/patent rights to anything I might “invent”“…… By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 30th July 2008 12:20 GMT

Hence the attraction of Self Employment in Civvy Street, AC?

For the Military, is it their preferred Option that it be a LifeStyle Choice 24/7/365 ….. followed by an Index Linked Pension from the age of 55 for the Dedication?

http://theregister.co.uk/2008/07/30/dmca_suit_blocked/comments